televisions

LG 42LW5300 Review

42 in.

All things considered, for the price you could do a lot worse than bringing this LG 42LW5300 home.

Our editors review and recommend products to help you buy the stuff you need. If you make a purchase by clicking one of our links, we may earn a small share of the revenue. Our picks and opinions are independent from any business incentives.
Series Name xxLW5300
General Type LED
Screen Size 42 in.
Format 1080p
3D Type Passive
Refresh Rate 120 Hz
CF Card No
Aspect Ratio 16:9
Surround Mode Yes
Wall Mount Included No
Width (in) 39.3
Display Technology LCD
Resolution 1920 x 1080
Composite Video 2
3.5mm Headphone Jack 1
Zigbee No
MMC No
Equalizer Yes
Depth (in) 10.0
HDMI In 3
VGA 1
DLNA No
MemoryStick No
Number of Speakers 2
Remote Included Yes
Weight (lbs) 33.5
DVI 0
xD No
Speaker Wattage 10.0
OTA Analog Antenna No
USB Yes
Is 3D Yes
OTA Digital Antenna Yes
DVD No
Analog Cable Tuner No
Digital Cable Tuner No
Firewire No
Cablecard No
Photo Playback Ability Yes
Analog Audio In 4
Music Playback Ability Yes
3.5mm Audio Input Jack 1
Video Playback Ability Yes
Ethernet No
Online Features No
USB Number 1
Media Card List 0
EX-LINK No
Backlighting LED-edgelit
RS-232C Yes
MSRP 899
Blu-Ray No
Brand Name (LG)
Manufacturer Name LG
Manufacturer Url http://www.lg.com/us/tv-audio-video/televisions/LG-led-tv-42LW5300.jsp
Series Name xxLW5300
Component Video In 2
Analog Audio Out 1
Wi-Fi No
SD Card No
Stand Included Yes
Height (in) 27.0
S-Video 0
SPDIF (Digital audio output) 1
Bluetooth No
Our editors review and recommend products to help you buy the stuff you need. If you make a purchase by clicking one of our links, we may earn a small share of the revenue. Our picks and opinions are independent from any business incentives.
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Our editors review and recommend products to help you buy the stuff you need. If you make a purchase by clicking one of our links, we may earn a small share of the revenue. Our picks and opinions are independent from any business incentives.

What's Your Take?

All Comments